Page 267 of 379

Atmosphere Comparison

Posted: May 15 2009 8:25 pm
by Jim
The endless chatter of weather.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 21 2017 7:40 pm
by johnlp
Roosevelt lake is up 1.07 feet since Saturday. The lake is 33.58 square miles. There are 640 acres per sq mile. There are 325,851 gallons per acre foot of water. Rounded off that comes to 7.49 billion gallons of flow into the lake since Saturday. Impressive. The lake is only up 1%. It holds quite a bit.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 21 2017 7:51 pm
by Jim
@johnlp
And that is good, but I was basically stating that I wonder if there will be a large spring run off next month or so, as I don't know that the Salt and Black River watersheds have a large snow pack, given the precipitation this winter.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 21 2017 7:55 pm
by johnlp
Agreed. Snow is key.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 21 2017 7:59 pm
by Jim
SRP knows the street value of that mountain.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 21 2017 10:08 pm
by chumley
Roosevelt has risen 5 feet in each January and February. Unless something extraordinary happens in the next couple of months that significantly increases the rate of input above what it has been these past two months, there's no chance of it filling this spring.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 23 2017 9:07 am
by chumley
With the rain last weekend, I was expecting to see more of an impact in the latest drought report, but there was essentially no change across Arizona. Large swaths of central and southern California on the other hand ...

I've put together this week's map vs. last week, as well as the map from the start of the water year in October. It's been a good winter so far!

http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 23 2017 9:40 am
by Jim
From the current drought monitor:
A shallow snowpack with low SWE along the eastern portion on the Mogollon Rim in eastern Arizona prompted the introduction of a spot of D1.
Actually, our fair state has had an increase in drought per the discussion and map, and a lack of snow water equivalent, or snow pack, in the eastern Mogollon Rim and White Mountains, is the reason. This is pertinent to my earlier questions about the potential March snow run-off and Roosevelt lake.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 24 2017 10:57 am
by big_load
It's about 30F above average in NJ today. By the end of February, I think we'll have had at least 10 days that were 15F or more above average and only two or three that were more than 10F below average. The heat could lead to some late winter brush fires.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 27 2017 9:39 am
by chumley
A week ago the forecast called for the potential of a moderate storm today and tomorrow. As the week went on, the models all backed off on the available moisture for the storm. Then yesterday the models came back to a more aggressive system once again. Now today they are calling for 2-3" of rain (or snow water equivalent) in some of the mountain locations, and over a foot of snow above 7000 feet (up to 2 feet higher up).

Over half an inch is forecast in the Phoenix valley and over an inch in the northern/eastern Tonto foothills. Let's keep this winter going! :y:

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 27 2017 10:16 am
by SuperstitionGuy
chumley wrote:Let's keep this winter going!
In the meantime the sun is a shining in Apache Junction with no sign of rain.
Fake news? :scared:

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 27 2017 10:23 am
by chumley
Weather forecasters have been getting it wrong since the first time the Earth was flat.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 27 2017 11:27 am
by flagscott
SuperstitionGuy wrote:
chumley wrote:Let's keep this winter going!
In the meantime the sun is a shining in Apache Junction with no sign of rain.
Fake news? :scared:
Only if it was in the New York Times, CNN, or CBS.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 27 2017 11:34 am
by ALMAL
@chumley
Hopefully very short or no fire restrictions this spring, like 2015...

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 27 2017 1:45 pm
by chumley
@ALMAL
In my recollection that has much more to do with what happens in April and May than February and March.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 27 2017 2:10 pm
by rcorfman
SuperstitionGuy wrote:
chumley wrote:Let's keep this winter going!
In the meantime the sun is a shining in Apache Junction with no sign of rain. Fake news? :scared:
Well it was cloudy all morning in North Phoenix and is raining now.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 27 2017 2:52 pm
by CannondaleKid
ALMAL wrote:Hopefully very short or no fire restrictions this spring, like 2015...
More rain = more vegetation growth... and when that vegetation dries out who knows, it could be a bad year for fires.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 27 2017 5:52 pm
by flagscott
CannondaleKid wrote:
ALMAL wrote:Hopefully very short or no fire restrictions this spring, like 2015...
More rain = more vegetation growth... and when that vegetation dries out who knows, it could be a bad year for fires.
That's not really true--at least for this year. Scientists with a lot more patience than me have looked at fire histories by measuring tree rings, and in ponderosa pine at least, fires generally occur in the summer after a dry winter/spring, not a wet one. But having a couple of wet seasons followed by a dry season can increase fire severity. So watch out for 2018 if next winter turns out to be dry.

That said...the old patterns may not hold up anymore. A new paper out today basically says that thanks to humans, wildfires are happening way outside their normal seasons, and dryness is increasingly less important than the sheer number of idiots lighting fires. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/ ... u-s-humans

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 28 2017 8:02 am
by Jim
Hey, did anyone else remember that grass grows in lower elevations and one of the states biggest fires was a rapidly spreading grass fire in May or June of 2005, just north of Black Canyon City and after a very wet winter that spurned low elevation fine fuel growth? I wasn't even here, wouldn't be for a year, but I remember this.

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 28 2017 8:31 am
by chumley
Ponderosa forests and scrub desert are totally different. In my experience rainy winters cause high summer fire danger across the deserts but not in the forests.

In other news I see lots of 2-3" rain totals north of Phoenix. More than a foot of snow in Flagstaff and Snowbowl reporting 21" storm total so far, and expecting a few more inches before it ends. Not bad. :)

Re: Mindless weather chit chat

Posted: Feb 28 2017 8:44 am
by flagscott
Jim_H wrote:Hey, did anyone else remember that grass grows in lower elevations and one of the states biggest fires was a rapidly spreading grass fire in May or June of 2005, just north of Black Canyon City and after a very wet winter that spurned low elevation fine fuel growth? I wasn't even here, wouldn't be for a year, but I remember this.
I'm assuming this was a response to me. My comment above was specifically referring to ponderosa pine, as I mentioned. Here's another study, a classic, showing the same result--more fires happen in dry years than wet years: http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewc ... arkbeetles

As for other parts of Arizona, it's more complex. This paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... ran_Desert makes a strong case that you need two consecutive wet winters to significantly increase the likelihood of fire in the Sonoran desert. One wet winter alone does not have much of an effect.

In grassier areas, like Southeast Arizona, the relationship varies by elevation. Higher up (above 5000'), prior-year precipitation increases fire frequency. Lower down, fires happen more when it was wetter during the year before or the same year: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mi ... 000000.pdf There's evidence for the same in prairie areas that tend to dry out seasonally in the summer.

The studies I link to each studied hundreds of fires over decades or centuries. I would suggest not jumping to conclusions from any individual fire or even any individual fire year.