](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/10 ... cials?lite
Moderator: HAZ - Moderators
I think they are both forms of deliberate vandalism...and the Armstrong analogy I think....had to do more about the person and not the sport. But thats just how I read it. Maybe there is some more sinister motiveTough_Boots wrote:The goblin toppling and juniper cutting are all totally different issues.
I looked at both (goblin toppling & Juniper cutting) in a similar vein... while I feel the toppling was more like vandalism, both were intentional, both were ignorant, neither really thought out the consequences and it appears both sought adulation of some kind... and it appears both got it, albeit a bit different than intended.Tough_Boots wrote:I think one was intentional vandalism and one was just ignorant
I hear ya... Actually the NOT! was directed at the climber being referred to as a professional.Tough_Boots wrote:As far as Lance Armstrong-- maybe I really just cringed at the use of "NOT!" and couldn't stop myself from responding rudely ;)
Maybe I'm alone in this but I don't feel that following your passion automatically obligates you to be any kind of role model. People need to learn to stop being so offended whenever the more adventurous people they live vicariously through do something they don't like.CannondaleKid wrote:These are the type of folks I feel are doing harm by being very poor role models for the younger generation to look up to.
You're never alone here in HazlandTough_Boots wrote:Maybe I'm alone
I don't either. Whether it automatically obligates one or not, let's face it, in this day and age of instant news and fame, when you get to the top of your job, profession, sport or whatever, younger folks may look up to you and seek to emulate you.Tough_Boots wrote:I don't feel that following your passion automatically obligates you to be any kind of role model.
Well said... I'm not offended at all by what other more adventurous people do, it's just when they do it in a way that looks bad for their sport that I feel is inappropriate. In the case of the climber, by his actions it could lead to closing more areas to climbing, which hurts the climbing community as a whole. So as much as he sought the adulation, even feeling giddy when he thought he was getting a positive email about what he accomplished, well I'd say, he flat out blew it!Tough_Boots wrote:People need to learn to stop being so offended whenever the more adventurous people they live vicariously through do something they don't like.
Yeah, I agree, if only because it could send a message to others. As for those guys, there's no actual HOPE, since you can't fix stupid.Kwai Chang wrote:@kingsnake
Well there is a chance the fine will be nice and high.......they really should have had some jail time associated with that though....some community service is also in the cards......hopefully lots of time spent maintaining the trails....sad.
Um, didn't I just say that?Sredfield wrote:You can't fix stupid.