Crescent sunset
Moderator: HAZ - Moderators
Linked Guides none
Linked Area, etc none
-
CakewalkGuides: 1 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 8,345 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 03 2002 11:26 pm
- City, State: Glendale, AZ
Crescent sunset
On Monday, June 10th, the Moon will glide in front of the Sun as it sets over parts of North America. Ever see a crescent sunset?
In phoenix we will witness a 65% eclipse at sunset. Someone please take pictures...
Here is the link:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002 ... ?list54254
In phoenix we will witness a 65% eclipse at sunset. Someone please take pictures...
Here is the link:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002 ... ?list54254
< Insert Witty Remark here >
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
NighthikerGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,415 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 03 2002 6:59 am
- City, State: Payson
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm
That's a good question. I'm very interested in some replies.
I haven't used a film camera for years. But if I was going to, I think I'd start with kodachrome 25 for a direct light picture. Plus the film holds up great in the desert heat.
For digital. I've tried plenty of expensive filters without much luck. I'd like to hear some sucess stories. Personally I've found taking the raw picture then digital filtering works best.
Okay, I gotta get outta this city before morning RUSH HOUR! eeek
I haven't used a film camera for years. But if I was going to, I think I'd start with kodachrome 25 for a direct light picture. Plus the film holds up great in the desert heat.
For digital. I've tried plenty of expensive filters without much luck. I'd like to hear some sucess stories. Personally I've found taking the raw picture then digital filtering works best.
Okay, I gotta get outta this city before morning RUSH HOUR! eeek
- joe
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
snow22_5150Guides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 7,616 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Apr 22 2002 2:13 pm
- City, State: Mesa, AZ
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
olesmaGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 8,457 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 09 2002 1:02 pm
- City, State: Mesa, AZ
Damaged CCDs?
Hey, Joe, will facing the digital camera straight at the sunset damage the CCDs? I've never tried anything with light that intense directly on the sensors.
'Weird is a relative, not an absolute.' - A. Einstein
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
CakewalkGuides: 1 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 8,345 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 03 2002 11:26 pm
- City, State: Glendale, AZ
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
olesmaGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 8,457 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 09 2002 1:02 pm
- City, State: Mesa, AZ
Yea, that works
Yes, the developed film (those black frames) work well as a sun filter. I even once made a pair of sunglasses with them to look at the sun. They do the job pretty well.
Hey, maybe that could cover the apature of the camera for a filter to photograph the thing?
Hey, maybe that could cover the apature of the camera for a filter to photograph the thing?
'Weird is a relative, not an absolute.' - A. Einstein
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm
Sunsets aren't that harsh, especially with an eclipse.
I suppose, if focused just right, and held long enough, you could damage the ccd with a long direct shot. But it would only be due to melting. Those suckers are tough and amazing that they even work at all. I played with some in electronics class in the mid eighties at Scottsdale Vo-Tech! It's a Hilton now
I suppose, if focused just right, and held long enough, you could damage the ccd with a long direct shot. But it would only be due to melting. Those suckers are tough and amazing that they even work at all. I played with some in electronics class in the mid eighties at Scottsdale Vo-Tech! It's a Hilton now

- joe
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
CakewalkGuides: 1 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 8,345 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 03 2002 11:26 pm
- City, State: Glendale, AZ
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm
Some anonymous member sent me this azcentral article

anonymous wrote:June 09, 2002 12:00:00
Arizona is one of the best spots in the world to catch Monday's annular solar eclipse, a sight that comes around about once every couple of years.
The eclipse will reach its peak at about 6:20 p.m. for Valley residents, when the moon will block 72 percent of the sun.
In Baja California, the moon will hide all but a faint ring of light.
On the East Coast, the eclipse will not be visible, and in Minnesota, the moon will block only 20 percent of the sun.
Valley residents likely will notice only a slight dimming of the sky.
Experts caution that directly viewing an eclipse can cause serious eye damage.
Use optical filters or projection devices to see the phenomenon this week.
- joe
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm

http://hikearizona.com/photocode.php?ID=352&TNI=114
Anybody get a good shot?
- joe
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
chihiggsGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 7,457 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Apr 11 2002 9:33 am
- City, State: Gilbert, AZ
Forgotten shot
Joe sorry--forgot to try for a photo
Olesma--Thanks for the film trick you posted.....I put those over sunglasses and grabbed a quick peek. Didn't look into it directly though.
Caught the partial eclipse from the backyard. Anyone catch it anyplace cool?

Olesma--Thanks for the film trick you posted.....I put those over sunglasses and grabbed a quick peek. Didn't look into it directly though.
Caught the partial eclipse from the backyard. Anyone catch it anyplace cool?
Higgs
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
CakewalkGuides: 1 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 8,345 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 03 2002 11:26 pm
- City, State: Glendale, AZ
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
olesmaGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 8,457 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 09 2002 1:02 pm
- City, State: Mesa, AZ
Looked great
I went outside with the wife and son and we watched the eclipse for a good 10 minutes, used 3 different filters, and got a really good look at it. People were coming home from work and we stopped them and let them take a look too. Everyone was pretty impressed. Really neat stuff.
I tried to get a picture with my digital, but it just wouldn't cooperate. I tried viewing directly and with a filter, and neither way really captured the eclipse in any way that looked right. Mostly just a big bright spot front and center. Blah.
I guess if I had a nice 35 mm SLR then spent the money on a really good lens filtre I might have gotten something. Oh, well. Digital is good for some things, but apparently my little 2 MP Cannon isn't good for eclipses.
I tried to get a picture with my digital, but it just wouldn't cooperate. I tried viewing directly and with a filter, and neither way really captured the eclipse in any way that looked right. Mostly just a big bright spot front and center. Blah.
I guess if I had a nice 35 mm SLR then spent the money on a really good lens filtre I might have gotten something. Oh, well. Digital is good for some things, but apparently my little 2 MP Cannon isn't good for eclipses.
'Weird is a relative, not an absolute.' - A. Einstein
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes

